Competency gaps and institutional challenges for translational research in medical devices: insights from Brazilian researchers | BMC Medical Education

DeChant AK, Fening S, Haag M, Harte W, Chance MR. Optimizing biomedical discoveries as an engine of culture change in an academic medical center. J Clin Transl Sci. 2022;6(1):e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.888.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Lundvall BA, Joseph KJ, Chaminade C, Vang J, editors. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. vol. 1. 1st ed. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803427.

Lundvall BA. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. vol. 1. 1st ed. London: Anthem Press; 2016. Accessed 31 Jan 2024.

Guimarães R. Entrepreneurial Logic in health research. Cienc Saúde Coletiva. 2019;24(9):3571–82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018249.10292019.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Christensen CM, Bohmer R, Kenagy J, et al. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(5):102–17.

Google Scholar 

Carayannis EG, Barth TD, Campbell DF. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep. 2012;1(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Carayannis EG, Campbell DF. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev (IJSESD). 2010;1(1):41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Sanami M, Flood T, Hall R, Kingscott F, Jayne D, Culmer P. Translating healthcare innovation from academia to industry. Adv Mech Eng. 2017;9(3):1687814017694114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017694114.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Dutta S, Lanvin B, Rivera León L, Wunsch-Vincent S. Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. 16th ed. Global Innovation Index. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO); 2023. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.48220.

Bori, Elsevier. 2023: ano de queda na produção científica de 35 países, inclusive o Brasil. 2023. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

De Negri F. New pathways for innovation in Brazil. vol. 1. 1st ed. Washington, DC: Wilson Center: Rio de Janeiro: Ipea; 2021. https://doi.org/10.38116/978-65-5635-021-9.

Nonaka I. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organ Sci. 1994;5(1):14–37.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação. vol. 1. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus; 1997.

Illeris K. Teorias contemporâneas da aprendizagem. 1st ed. Porto Alegre: Penso Editora; 2013.

Google Scholar 

Usher R. Experiência, pedagogia e práticas sociais. In: Illeris K, editor. Teorias contemporâneas da aprendizagem, vol. 1. Porto Alegre: Penso Editora; 2013. p. 199.

Google Scholar 

Figueiredo PN. National innovation strategy: A brief contribution to its effectiveness from the perspective of technological capability accumulation. Rev Adm Publica. 2023;57(5):e2022-0418. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220418.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Hörig H, Marincola E, Marincola FM. Obstacles and opportunities in translational research. Nat Med. 2005;11(7):705–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0705-705.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Niederhuber JE. Translating Discovery to Patient Care. JAMA. 2010;303(11):1088–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.281.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Watts G. Lost in translation. BMJ. 2011;343:d7047. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7047.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Woolf SH. The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters. JAMA. 2008;299(2):211–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2007.26.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Rubio DM, Schoenbaum EE, Lee LS, Schteingart DE, Marantz PR, Anderson KE, et al. Defining Translational Research: Implications for Training. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):470–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd618.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Schulte PA, Cunningham TR, Nickels L, Felknor S, Guerin R, Blosser F, et al. Translation research in occupational safety and health: A proposed framework. Am J Ind Med. 2017;60(12):1011–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22780.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Keramaris NC, Kanakaris NK, Tzioupis C, Kontakis G, Giannoudis PV. Translational research: From benchside to bedside. Injury. 2008;39(6):643–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.051.

Article 

Google Scholar 

CDC. Translation Research. 2018. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Accessed 15 Oct 2023.

Institute of Medicine. The CTSA Program at NIH: Opportunities for Advancing Clinical and Translational Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. https://doi.org/10.17226/18323.

Nicolescu B. A Evolução Transdisciplinar a Universidade Condição para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. In: Chulalongkorn University, editor. A Responsabilidade da Universidade para com a Sociedade. vol. 1 of 1. International Association of Universities. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University: CIRET – Centre International de Recherches et études Transdisciplinaires; 1997. p. b12c8por. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

Lottes AE, Cavanaugh KJ, Chan YYF, Devlin VJ, Goergen CJ, Jean R, et al. Navigating the Regulatory Pathway for Medical Devices–a Conversation with the FDA, Clinicians, Researchers, and Industry Experts. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2022;15(5):927–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-022-10232-1.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Marcus HJ, Payne CJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Marcus AP, Yang GZ, Darzi A, et al. Regulatory approval of new medical devices: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2016;353. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2587.

Schwartz J, Macomber C. So, You Think You Have an Idea: A Practical Risk Reduction-Conceptual Model for Academic Translational Research. Bioengineering. 2017;4(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020029.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Gadelha CAG, Vargas MA, Alves NG. Translational research and innovation systems in health: implications on the biopharmaceutical segment. Saúde Debate. 2019;43(spe2):133–46. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042019S210.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Guimarães R, Noronha J, Elias FTS, Gadelha CAG, Carvalheiro JDR, Ribeiro A. Policy for Science, Technology and Innovation in Health. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2019;24(3):881–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018243.34652018.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Guimarães R. Translational research: an interpretation. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2013;18(6):1731–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000600024.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Mayrink NNV, Alcoforado L, Chioro A, Fernandes F, Lima TS, Camargo EB, et al. Translational research in health technologies: A scoping review. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:957367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.957367.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Le Boterf G. De la compétence à la navigation professionnelle. 1st ed. France: Les Éditions d’organisation. Fait partie d’un numéro thématique: Immigration; 1997.

Hendarman AF, Cantner U. Soft skills, hard skills, and individual innovativeness. Eurasian Bus Rev. 2018;8(2):139–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-017-0076-6.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Kyllonen PC. Soft Skills for the Workplace. Change Mag High Learn. 2013;45(6):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2013.841516.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Robles MM. Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace. Bus Commun Q. 2012;75(4):453–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912460400.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Gadelha CAG. Health Economic-Industrial Complex: the economic and material basis of the Brazilian Unified National Health System. Cad Saúde Pública. 2022;38:e00263321. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00263321.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Gadelha CAG. Saúde é desenvolvimento: o Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde como opção estratégica nacional. vol. 1. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz – CEE: Centro de Estudos Estratégicos da Fiocruz Antonio Ivo de Carvalho (CEE); 2022.

Gadelha CAG, Temporão JG. Development, Innovation and Health: the theoretical and political perspective of the Health Economic-Industrial Complex. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2018;23(6):1891–902. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018236.06482018.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Buss PM, Chamas C, Faid M, Morel C. Development, health, and international policy: the research and innovation dimension. Cad Saúde Pública. 2016;32:e00046815. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-311X00046815.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Maldonado J, Gadelha CAG, Costa LS, Vargas M. The innovative dynamic of the mechanics, electronics and materials subsystem. Rev Saúde Pública. 2012;46:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012000700005.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Maldonado J, Gadelha CAG, Vargas M. O subsistema de base mecânica, eletrônica e de materiais do complexo econômico industrial da saúde: perspectivas para 2022/2030. Broy M, Denert E, editors. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz/Ipea/Ministério da Saúde/Secretaria de Assuntos Estratégicos da Presidência da República: Scielo Books; 2013.

World Health Organization. World report on knowledge for better health: strengthening health systems. 2004. World Health Organization, Geneva PP – Geneva [Online]. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

World Health Organization. Emerging technologies and scientific innovations: A global public health perspective. 2023. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

World Health Organization. Local Production and Technology Transfer to Increase Access to Medical Devices — Addressing the barriers and challenges in low- and middle- income countries. 2012. Accessed 31 Jan 2024.

World Health Organization. Development of medical device policies. (WHO Medical device technical series). 2011. Accessed 31 Jan 2024.

World Health Organization. Global atlas of medical devices 2022. 2022. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

United Nations. Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals. New York; 2015. Accessed 25 Mar 2024.

World Health Organization. Human resources for medical devices, the role of biomedical engineers (WHO Medical device technical series). 2017. Accessed 31 Jan 2024.

Fernández-Arias P, Anton-Sancho Á, Vergara D, Barrientos A. Soft Skills of American University Teachers: Self-Concept. Sustainability. 2021;13(22):12397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212397.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Al-Sa’di A, Yamjal P, Ahmad E, Panjabi R, Allott McPhee C, Guler O. Assessing Educators’ Soft Skills: Developing a Self-Assessment Instrument. Adm Sci. 2023;13(9):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090208.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Anton-Sancho A, Vergara D, Fernández-Arias P. Self-Assessment of Soft Skills of University Teachers from Countries with a Low Level of Digital Competence. Electronics. 2021;10(20):2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10202532.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Brasil. Pesquisa de Saúde. 2024. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

CNPQ. Consulta parametrizada — Diretório dos Grupos de Pesquisa no Brasil — Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. 2024. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

Brasil. pePI — Pesquisa em Propriedade Industrial — Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial — Ministério da Economia. 2024. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

Bardin L. Análise de Conteúdo. 1st ed. São Paulo: Edições 70/Almedina Brasil; 2016.

Nascimento AFD. Analysis of the impact of clinical evaluation on the submissions of high risk medical devices to the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. Health Surveill Under Debate Soc Sci Technol. 2019;7(2):37–45. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269x.01231.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Anderson JR, Chung TDY, Clark L, Weis JA, Danielsen AJ, Khosla S, et al. Translation to Practice: Accelerating the Cycle of Innovation to Impact. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(3):490–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.008.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Felipe MSS, Rezende KS, Rosa MFF, Gadelha CAG. A look at the Industrial Economic Health Complex and Translational Research. Saúde Debate. 2019;43(123):1181–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201912316.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Lupatini EDO, Barreto JOM, Zimmermann IR, Silva END. Medicines and translational research: steps, actors, and health policies in the Brazilian context. Saúde Debate. 2019;43(spe2):181–99. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042019S214.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Berro M, Burnett BK, Fromell GJ, Hartman KA, Rubinstein EP, Schuff KG, et al. Support for Investigator-Initiated Clinical Research Involving Investigational Drugs or Devices: The Clinical and Translational Science Award Experience. Acad Med. 2011;86(2):217–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182045059.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Levin L, Sheldon M, McDonough RS, Aronson N, Rovers M, Gibson CM, et al. Early technology review: towards an expedited pathway. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024;40(1):e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000047.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Blankart CR, Dams F, Penton H, Kaló Z, Zemplényi A, Shatrov K, et al. Regulatory and HTA early dialogues in medical devices. Health Policy. 2021;125(10):1322–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.010.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Lievevrouw E, Marelli L, Van Hoyweghen I. The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation. BioSocieties. 2022;17(3):549–76. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Bano R, Gupta S, Shekhar C. Translational research in biomedical sciences in India: Challenges, observations & national perspectives. Indian J Med Res. 2020;152(4):335–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1296_19.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Pitzen JH, Dieter HL, Gronseth DL, Dahl AK, Boyle VL, Maran T, et al. Transforming the practice of medicine through team science. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00619-4.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Borton DA, Dawes HE, Worrell GA, Starr PA, Denison TJ. Developing Collaborative Platforms to Advance Neurotechnology and Its Translation. Neuron. 2020;108(2):286–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.001.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Tellez A, Ferrone M, Granada JF. Translational Research: The Cornerstone for Medical Technology Advancement. Toxicol Pathol. 2019;47(3):203–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318819972.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Conto M, Bonan LFS. Legal framework of adoption and access of medical devices in Brazil: structure, types of assessment and opportunities for advances. J Bras Econ Saúde. 2020;12(3):213–25. https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v12.n3.p213-25.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Ferreira-Da-Silva AL, Ribeiro RA, Santos VCC, Elias FTS, d’Oliveira ALP, Polanczyk CA. Guidelines for budget impact analysis of health technologies in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2012;28(7):1223–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2012000700002.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Brasil. O uso de limiares de custo-efetividade nas Decisões em Saúde: Recomendações da Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS. 2022. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

Campolina AG, Yuba TY, Soárez PCD. Decision criteria for resource allocation: an analysis of CONITEC oncology reports. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2022;27(7):2563–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232022277.14242021.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Brasil. Diretrizes Metodológicas: Diretriz de Avaliação Econômica – 2a edição. 2014. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

Toscas FS. Approaches to horizon scanning and technological prospecting in medical devices. J Bras Econ Saúde. 2021;13(3):236–41. https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v13.n3.p236-41.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Tarricone R, Torbica A, Drummond M. Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project. Health Econ. 2017;26(S1):5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3469.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Pecchia L, Craven MP. Early stage Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of biomedical devices. The MATCH experience. In: Long M, editor. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering May 26-31, 2012, Beijing, China. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. pp. 1525–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29305-4_401.

Tummers M, Kværner K, Sampietro-Colom L, Siebert M, Krahn M, Melien O, et al. On the integration of early health technology assessment in the innovation process: reflections from five stakeholders. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(5):481–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462320000756.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Brasil. DECRETO N° 9.283, DE 7 DE FEVEREIRO DE 2018. 2018. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

Brasil. Plataforma Nacional de Infraestrutura de Pesquisa MCTI. 2024. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.

Brasil. Plano de Ação de Pesquisa Clínica no Brasil. 2020. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

Hu F, Qiu L, Zhou H. Medical Device Product Innovation Choices in Asia: An Empirical Analysis Based on Product Space. Front Public Health. 2022;10:871575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.871575.

Article 

Google Scholar 

Carvalho ARd, Gala P. Brasil, uma economia que não aprende: novas perspectivas para entender nosso fracasso. vol. 1. 1st ed. São Paulo: E-book; 2020. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

Brasil. DECRETO N° 11.715, DE 26 DE SETEMBRO DE 2023. 2023. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

Brasil. PORTARIA GM/MS N° 1.354, DE 27 DE SETEMBRO DE 2023. 2023. Accessed 01 Feb 2024.

Brasil. PORTARIA GM/MS N° 2.261, DE 8 DE DEZEMBRO DE 2023. 2023. Accessed 10 Dec 2024.